Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
Bearfan1963

Shame, Shame

Recommended Posts

Bearfan1963    2
Bearfan1963

I know its legal, but I don't have to like it. I posted earlier when the new slots came out that I was afraid that anglers would keep very small ones when keepers were hard to find. Well I just got back and had to shake my head noticably in disgust one evening as I saw a 5 gal. bucket 3/4 full of 10-11" walleye. Give me a break. I guess we all have opinions and mine is that anything less than 14" was back in the water. I really wish they would have put a minimum size limit. I hope this is only isolated cases and doesn't reduce the quantity of eaters in the in the next 4 years of the current slot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
tearin' lips    0
tearin' lips

It is a rare case to see small 'eyes like that being kept. This issue can go two ways.

1) You can look at it as reducing the numbers of eater sized fish for next year and the year after or...

2) Is it better that all the bigger fish are protected for spawning, hence producing thousands of more walleyes for future generations.

Personally from a Lake Ecologists perspective it is much better to extend that slot on the upper reaches and get some big females with the ability to produce thousands and thousands of eggs. This will be much more beneficial for the fishery in the future. Also studies on Rainy Lake have shown that almost all of the walleyes being kept on Rainy by fishermen are 13"-16". Lake Ecology is a science, but it is always changing. That is why they have creel surveyists on the water and at the landings. Please don't be rude to these gentlemen/women. They are just providing information to the DNR that will help them better the fisheries in the future.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
AWarrior    0
AWarrior

I also witnessed the taking of small (less thasn 10") walleyes this past week. I was always under the impression the slot was not needed, but I watched one boat place (2) 10" eyes into their live well, and this was not the only "catch" I witnessed. It happens entirely too much. It is a shame people can't think of the future, and not just themselves. Bring back the lower slot!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wade Joseph    0
Wade Joseph

Lips, you have a good point, but I gotta agree with the original post. I would like to see a "keeper" slot of 13-17" no need to keep anything smaller than 13". Why not improve the fishery "at both ends" of the spectrum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
tearin' lips    0
tearin' lips

It's a gray area I realize that, but it seems to have worked REALLY, REALLY well for Rainy...In the future it will drastically improve the conditions on Kab/Nam as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BigStevie    0
BigStevie

Yeah, that's a hard one... A definite gray area as was mentioned. It's one thing to keep a couple of 11 inchers for a nice meal on a once a year weekend trip to Kab/Nam, and an entirely different thing to make a regular habit of it. I hear you guys about the lower slot... That would definitely eliminate the really small fish from being harvested.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bearfan1963    2
Bearfan1963

Lips,

I do like the 17-28" C & R, I had a lot of fun bringing in quite a few 23-26" this year, even without the slot I would have let them go. My point was that I thought there should have been a minimum size limit and then a previously posted, both ends would have been protected. I don't want to see alot of people using minnow buckets for livewells.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hockey Guy    0
Hockey Guy

The thing to remember here is why the lower end of the slot was removed from the regulations in the first place. Besides the proven benefit that Tearin’ Lips mentions above, the DNR got a lot of pressure from anglers (many of them resort owners and other locals). They stated that the lower end of the slot should be removed because smaller fish tend to swallow the hook. If the fish is going to die, you may as well keep it instead of feeding the seagulls and eagles.

Personally, I think the DNR figured that the un-written rule of not keeping a fish under 12”-13” would be respected and that the new regulations would not be abused. As with most things, it comes down to a matter of education. Many people don’t know that if they are catching fish too small they should try shallower and deeper until they find what they are looking for. Maybe as more avid fisherman, we should tactfully try to educate these people when we see this happen.

I know the last thing I want to see right now is less people buying fishing licenses because ultimately that will decrease the number of kids being introduced to fishing. I know this sound like two separate issues, but think about it… The person that kept a bucket full of 10”-12” fish is probably someone that only goes fishing once a year and doesn’t know any better. They also probably had a blast catching those fish. Hopefully they had youngsters with them and he/she also had a blast. If we as more experienced anglers make fun of them or tell them how stupid they are, that is going to turn their fun into a negative experience. The number of fishing licenses has gone down dramatically in the last 20 years (I heard 40% somewhere). If that trend continues we won’t have the stocking we have now or the people to enforce regulations at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • jj56342
      OK thank you thinking about going up first week in September
    • proguide
      Low water continues to be the issue on the Red. Below the dams still remains sketchy so use boats at your own risk.  The fishing remains stable, similar to last week in that the fish are spread out but in the holes in the middle of the river.  Short 15-20 minute sits on spots keeping the bait fresh looking for the active catfish.
        Bait is still heavy to frogs and frozen suckers with goldeyes working some but it seems that frog and sucker are the best.  As water cools down I suspect fresh sucker will come into play as well.
    • monstermoose78
      I used to have many fields but some guides came in and pay for the fields. I am down to 3 farms but they don't have any small grains this year. So I am going to take the early season off. As I know the geese will use some ponds to rest and I have access to them so I will wait until the regular season to pick off a few geese.
    • Cheers
      get a guide for a day
    • Daniel Anderson
      Pulled a nice cat out of the Cloquet tonight... 
    • ZachD
      That's what I planned on doing while I bow hunted but wasn't sure since I got one in spring if I could get another. Thanks  
    • delcecchi
      I was marking various things, but I didn't note a correlation between marking something and catching the walleye.  Also was catching smallies on the same reefs, although maybe at a little different depth.   In fact I was surprised when the walleye hit.  Likewise the other one the next evening.
    • Mark Lee
      Eden prairie purgatory lake is full of carp. You can see them from the dock or the bridge.
    • carpface
          Orvis has some awesome tutorials on their web sites. They teach at whatever level you are in flyfishing. I've gone there many times. They've also got an awesome app with fishing reports including wwater conditions, fly selection and hw to fish it.       Check them out and good fishing.
    • Wakemup
      I didn't fish any walleye this weekend- only bass. I would fish Friday and Saturday mornings from 530-830 and caught half a dozen largies in the 3-4lb range on a spinner bait. I just got my Garmin fish finder with sideview which will hopefully help me better locate the walleyes. Del, were you marking fish as you'd go over them?