Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
Bearfan1963

Shame, Shame

Recommended Posts

Bearfan1963

I know its legal, but I don't have to like it. I posted earlier when the new slots came out that I was afraid that anglers would keep very small ones when keepers were hard to find. Well I just got back and had to shake my head noticably in disgust one evening as I saw a 5 gal. bucket 3/4 full of 10-11" walleye. Give me a break. I guess we all have opinions and mine is that anything less than 14" was back in the water. I really wish they would have put a minimum size limit. I hope this is only isolated cases and doesn't reduce the quantity of eaters in the in the next 4 years of the current slot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
tearin' lips

It is a rare case to see small 'eyes like that being kept. This issue can go two ways.

1) You can look at it as reducing the numbers of eater sized fish for next year and the year after or...

2) Is it better that all the bigger fish are protected for spawning, hence producing thousands of more walleyes for future generations.

Personally from a Lake Ecologists perspective it is much better to extend that slot on the upper reaches and get some big females with the ability to produce thousands and thousands of eggs. This will be much more beneficial for the fishery in the future. Also studies on Rainy Lake have shown that almost all of the walleyes being kept on Rainy by fishermen are 13"-16". Lake Ecology is a science, but it is always changing. That is why they have creel surveyists on the water and at the landings. Please don't be rude to these gentlemen/women. They are just providing information to the DNR that will help them better the fisheries in the future.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
AWarrior

I also witnessed the taking of small (less thasn 10") walleyes this past week. I was always under the impression the slot was not needed, but I watched one boat place (2) 10" eyes into their live well, and this was not the only "catch" I witnessed. It happens entirely too much. It is a shame people can't think of the future, and not just themselves. Bring back the lower slot!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wade Joseph

Lips, you have a good point, but I gotta agree with the original post. I would like to see a "keeper" slot of 13-17" no need to keep anything smaller than 13". Why not improve the fishery "at both ends" of the spectrum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
tearin' lips

It's a gray area I realize that, but it seems to have worked REALLY, REALLY well for Rainy...In the future it will drastically improve the conditions on Kab/Nam as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BigStevie

Yeah, that's a hard one... A definite gray area as was mentioned. It's one thing to keep a couple of 11 inchers for a nice meal on a once a year weekend trip to Kab/Nam, and an entirely different thing to make a regular habit of it. I hear you guys about the lower slot... That would definitely eliminate the really small fish from being harvested.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bearfan1963

Lips,

I do like the 17-28" C & R, I had a lot of fun bringing in quite a few 23-26" this year, even without the slot I would have let them go. My point was that I thought there should have been a minimum size limit and then a previously posted, both ends would have been protected. I don't want to see alot of people using minnow buckets for livewells.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hockey Guy

The thing to remember here is why the lower end of the slot was removed from the regulations in the first place. Besides the proven benefit that Tearin’ Lips mentions above, the DNR got a lot of pressure from anglers (many of them resort owners and other locals). They stated that the lower end of the slot should be removed because smaller fish tend to swallow the hook. If the fish is going to die, you may as well keep it instead of feeding the seagulls and eagles.

Personally, I think the DNR figured that the un-written rule of not keeping a fish under 12”-13” would be respected and that the new regulations would not be abused. As with most things, it comes down to a matter of education. Many people don’t know that if they are catching fish too small they should try shallower and deeper until they find what they are looking for. Maybe as more avid fisherman, we should tactfully try to educate these people when we see this happen.

I know the last thing I want to see right now is less people buying fishing licenses because ultimately that will decrease the number of kids being introduced to fishing. I know this sound like two separate issues, but think about it… The person that kept a bucket full of 10”-12” fish is probably someone that only goes fishing once a year and doesn’t know any better. They also probably had a blast catching those fish. Hopefully they had youngsters with them and he/she also had a blast. If we as more experienced anglers make fun of them or tell them how stupid they are, that is going to turn their fun into a negative experience. The number of fishing licenses has gone down dramatically in the last 20 years (I heard 40% somewhere). If that trend continues we won’t have the stocking we have now or the people to enforce regulations at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • Jim Almquist
      Steve, Thanks for helping me get a deal on my Otter. I was able to pick it up at Marine General on Monday. Can't believe all of the ice stakes that came with it. Bought one of the Eskimo drill adapters to install them.  
    • eyes55117
      Just out on 1st Lake after work 5” solid clear ice out to 17’ of water 
    • Blackhawkxp
      Any new updates on the ice thickness.  Looking to get out on walk-able ice this weekend.  Seems like the darn winds blows 45 mph every day lately.
    • nofishfisherman
      Thanks for the reply, I'll check them out.
    • Reel_Magic
      I went out on Horseshoe on Sunday and where the ice remained from the first freeze it is a solid 6 in.  Where it recently froze over last week its was 3 inches at best.  Now that we have snow cover it will be hard to find that line.  I was out with the wheeler on sunday but stayed on the "old" ice that I knew was "safe".  I wouldn't use a wheeler from the access or go exploring quite yet.  Plan on heading back out Thursday and will try and give an update
    • Rancid Crabtree
      went out last night. 2.5-3" of solid clear ice. Single digits last night and still pretty cold today...wouldn't be surprised to find another inch when i head out this evening.  Forecast temps have been lowered a few degrees so we shouldnt be losing any ice through the week/weekend. Hopefully making a bit more each night. Breaking out the popup this weekend!
    • icepike 1
      So there's a guy that wants to trade his Frabill 3 man side door entry flip over ice house for my one man clam Legend thermal Ice House. Thinking I might go for it but was wondering if I should stay away from Frabill for any reason? Wondering if I could get any input and if this is a good deal or not. Thanks in advance.
    • TomWehler
      Total agree Topwater mix rules for a kid learning to muskie fish.  Kayak ~~~ At 14 years can by now control the craft & cast pretty well so mix of small to medium size bucktails and a glider or two kick it any time.  Host of things to purchase out there but really no need. Keep it simple, have fun, learn the lake, the fish, the food....he will enjoy it an be hooked for long long time.  And will he succeed ~ YES indeed ~ 96 & 3/4 percent ~  guaranteed.   : )     Keep on rocken!    T
    • gimruis
      I used to fish Lake Shakopee regularly.  I did awesome catching largemouth bass there with good average size, and never had any competition.  A couple years ago, they did some construction upstream by the start of the river at the base of Vineland Bay for road construction and they had to drop water levels to do it.  The flow rate never came back to normal.  Then they took out Buckmore Dam in the state park at the base of Lake Ogechie which also altered the flow through that area.  I tried it once each the past two years and only caught 1 bass each time, in addition to about 40 pike.  Every single pike was the same size, about 20-22 inches.  Just snake after snake.  Slime city.  I think the alteration of the river flow through that area has permanently ruined the bass fishing there.
    • crappie king 42
      Just goes to show that if you put the time in to eplore new places just to see if there is anything in said body of water..... it can have very good payouts. The body of water that we got the eyes out of i have never fished before. Grew up next to it basically its only 10 min from the house. When they started hitting all fish were caught one after another i have never had walleyes through the ice bite like they did. A new experiance and i was able to share it with friends. Hope everyone is being safe out there.