Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
Lake Trout

Downrigging the flats?

Recommended Posts

Lake Trout

I'm thinking of using my downriggers over the flats with a floating Rapala. Anybody do this before? Seems like it would be a good thing to do since the flats are just that-flat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
eyewarrior

Down rigging should work. We troll leadcore and deep divers on flat lines on/near flts all the time. Dont know if the cannon ball would spook fish or not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Kyle Sandberg

Another idea instead of pulling your downriggers out there is to just use a three way rig with cranks. Get a big enough weight to sink the plug and put it on the bottom and troll.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Capt.Blaine

Just make sure you dont drag bottom that could make fishing tough for a big part of the flat you are on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lake Trout

Three way sounds interesting. If downrigging I'd keep it 3 feet off the bottom.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Big R

I tried downrigging with floating raps a number of years ago on the flats. I couldn't catch any even though I could slaughter them with spinners and crawlers on the same day. I think a lot had to do with the downrigger weight scaring them off. I was running about 30ft of line from the weight to the rapala. Thinking back I shoulda have made it at least 50ft. I probably spent about 8hrs over the course of 2 days tinking with downrigers and only had 1 that got off half way.

Good Luck anyways.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Kyle Sandberg

If you use downrigging, a lot of line isn't always the key. Use (if you have it) the trolling book with line back vs. depth. If you let out 50' it may only go 8' down. On the other hand, 10' out, it may go 2' down.

I don't know, thinking it out, if you have floaters on, they might float the 50' to the surface and you have to pull it back down to the weight?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Big R

I would consider myself an excellent troller. I use the Precion Trolling book and know all the diver curves and how different weights effect the lures. However much line I used I knew I was getting those cranks withing a 1ft off bottom. Even though I used floating raps (I also used Reef Runner Ripsticks) they still have a dive curve - they only float when not moving. My only conclusion with using the downriggers was the weight was spooking fish. I have only used downriggers on ML and LOW and LOW has substantially less visibility than ML so I think that is why they are so effective on LOW.

P.S. I do recall pulling crawler/spinners on downriggers to no avail.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Philydog

I've used downriggers before pulled floating raps 20 feet back 6feet above bottom , and # 5 shad raps 20 feet back 10 feet off bottom. both caught fish. 3 ways are less work but you need to go slow or pull alot of weight.IF you want to pull fast its eather downriggers or lead. I'll take lead!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bigfife

Downriggers work great on LOW, but not on Mille Lacs. I have tried downriggers on Mille Lacs a half dozen times and haven't caught anything. On some of those same days the fish were crushing long lines behind boards. My guess is that water clarity and proximity to the boat are two major factors. I think leadcore or long lining are much more effective.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • Tom Sawyer
    • monstermoose78
      Lots of birds kept spots open and the snow covered them now. It’s dangerous if you just rush out. Take your time if you are going to Ann lake or Lori or any in that area.  This my stomping grounds and there only one lake I would fish in the area
    • curt quesnell
      https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1779734562101735&id=770784022996799 Coming a long nicely. It is a mess but ice crews will get it done......soon. Here is the new report...
    • curt quesnell
      https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1779734562101735&id=770784022996799 Coming a long nicely. It is a mess but ice crews will get it done......soon. Here is the new report...
    • Spearing Machine
      Fished from 0815-1230 today out from McKinley out to 26 FOW. Found about 10.75 inches good ice with snow cover varying from 2 inches up to close to a foot in the soft drifts but still not too bad for hiking while dragging the flip over. Had decent action from 0830-0930 bringing up 8 walleyes less than 12 inches long, a 12 inch perch and 2 tullibees all released. About 50-50 on set line vs glow jigging spoon both with chubs. Not sure why I couldn't connect on better quality fish. Still a nice morning with the snow lightly falling and peaks of sun. Good running into you, Cliff! Hopefully we'll cross paths again this winter.
    • JIvers
      I may make it over to Elysian, Francis, or Tetonka this Saturday. Depends what I find on the Mississippi tomorrow afternoon. From what I have heard the ice on the backwaters around Winona and La Crosse may actually be in better shape than that around Waseca and Faribault, which is kind of odd for early ice. Usually the south-central MN lakes freeze up just a bit quicker.
    • JIvers
      I'd be surprised if there were much good ice on Bartlett this weekend--that deep water with a bit of current takes a while to freeze--but I may go out and take a look anyway tomorrow when I am up in the area getting my first ice fix of the year in. Anyone got any early ice reports for the Mississippi backwaters around Winona and Lacrosse? I'll be adding mine tomorrow night.
    • eyeguy 54
      this is for anybody that wants to pop up for fun.  dont need to be an fmer. so invite anybody. I have 2 newbies poppping up. 
    • eyeguy 54
      welcome to fm Dan
    • eyeguy 54
      now that is just lame. lol