Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
hitthebricks

Does Sonar scare fish?

11 posts in this topic

I was wondering if the pulse from a transducer scares the fish away. It seems to me that whenever I locate fish on a break or reef or where ever, after a very short while they have moved away from there. Would the sensativity setting also have a cause and effect with this? My tranducer also has dual freqencys, 200/83khz, what situations are they best suited for? HTB

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think these units produce enough power to have any effect like that on fish. You must remember fish are always on the move they aren't going to stay in one place for long.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is an interesting question and I asked it too many years ago when FishingMinneosta.com was just born, in fact it was one of my first questions.

Anyway I believe (now) the clicking of the transducer does not scare fish, your propeller, boat shape, motor etc scare the fish more than sonar.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think its scaring fish either. About the dual frequency ducer. Use the 200 kHz as your primary, it'll have much better resolution, definition of targets and bottom. The 83 kHz has a wider cone angle, will go deeper but you loose a lot of definition.

Trollers on Superior like the dual frequency because you can pick up downriggers weights that blow back with the lower kHz(wider cone angle) transducer. Typically you use them both on split screen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good points -- But I wonder if a vexilar or underwater camera can "spook" some fish in the winter. I have seen evidence both ways so I don't know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At times for certain species, I do believe the sonar can really wreak havoc on fishing...

For shallow water trout, especially through the ice, I believe a high ping output of a transducer can scare fish... Just an observation I have seen... As some ducers really ping hard and some have low output and do not have much or a pronounced ping...

Like I said, just an observation.. Nothing concrete...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A few years back taking 2 of my daughters bobber fishing in the boat,we fished a channel between 2 lakes.Every time a boat would come by we casted right behind him and the walleyes would bite then and only then.They liked the stirred up water.My daughters even got thier limits doing this.There was no current left in the channel as the water levels had went down.All of the walleyes were anout 2 #`s

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think of sonar as noise but as a pulse. If you hold your hand under the tranducer you can really feel the pulse as it moves. I guess that would be ping, when you turn up the sensativity, does it ping harder or faster? Another question is, didn't they crank the power all the way up on the sonar years ago in shallower water to scare the fish out to the planner boards when trolling. Thanks for the help! HTB

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've wondered about this myself at times and I have come to believe that the hulking boat hull overhead is more likely to spook the fish than the pinging from the transducer. For sure, the pinging is about 10 times stronger through the water but that also means the fish hear it long before the boat gets there and they aren't running scared. It's when the boat goes overhead that the fish will tend to spread out or perhaps even scatter a bit. I believe that is why long line trolling and planer boards can be effective.

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The gain/sensitivity doesn't change at the transducer, its a constant. When you turn up or down the gain you control the receiving end on the return ping.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It didn't scare the ones I caught but it must have scared the ones that I didn't catch grin.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • huntnfish
      I took the boat out for a test run last weekend to a quiet little lake. Water temp was 54. This weather isn't going to help with the water temps.
    • cartway
      Is the Vermilion egg capture complete?
    • Steelhead Chaser
      I hope to be out early next week.  Weather and river level depending.  Will post a report if I make it out.  Boat all ready to go.
    • crappie king 42
      I camp on an island so I don't have to worry about the landings and crowds. Do most of our fishing at night so I never worry about other anglers. If I needed to go to a public landing for opener I would never go. 
    • I fish, therefore I lie
      Here's the State's definition of a public water. Please note the highlighted text.  The Sucker is a Designated Trout Stream. (remember the blasting and improvements made back in the 70's? Those were public dollars that paid for it. )  That said, this isn't license for people to slob up private property, only to gain access to the stream. It might mean walking the shoreline from bluebird landing, or down from the freeway, but the water is open, and fishable,  to the high water mark. Subd. 15.Public waters. (a) "Public waters" means: (1) water basins assigned a shoreland management classification by the commissioner under sections 103F.201 to 103F.221; (2) waters of the state that have been finally determined to be public waters or navigable waters by a court of competent jurisdiction; (3) meandered lakes, excluding lakes that have been legally drained; (4) water basins previously designated by the commissioner for management for a specific purpose such as trout lakes and game lakes pursuant to applicable laws; (5) water basins designated as scientific and natural areas under section 84.033; (6) water basins located within and totally surrounded by publicly owned lands; (7) water basins where the state of Minnesota or the federal government holds title to any of the beds or shores, unless the owner declares that the water is not necessary for the purposes of the public ownership; (8) water basins where there is a publicly owned and controlled access that is intended to provide for public access to the water basin; (9) natural and altered watercourses with a total drainage area greater than two square miles; (10) natural and altered watercourses designated by the commissioner as trout streams; and (11) public waters wetlands, unless the statute expressly states otherwise.