Ice Fishing Minnesota Fishing Wisconsin & Hunting
HotSpotOutdoors.com

Fishing Minnesota
Fishing Wisconsin

"We Have More Fun"
Before Posting ANY - web address, commercial contact info, e-mail addresses or commercial pictures please Click Here for more information.
To get authorization to post for items or services wanted, or for sale items please Click Here
.
We insist that posts follow Forum Policy. Be sure to read it before posting. Thanks much.
Please keep your posts fun, friendly, and sharing with good family values.
You've Found the Best Outdoor Members on the Net Right here. Enjoy!

Demand WFN


Register HereForum Policy - Please, you must read before using this forum. Thanks!HOTSPOTOUTDOORS.com
Who's Online
72 registered (2thepointsetters, Bassman55, bgreen82, bigeyechaser92, biglakeba$$, Breaker, 7 invisible), 156 Guests and 64 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Outdoor Pro Store


On The Forums ...
spring bobbers
by MOBY RICHARD
0 seconds ago
lights on when fishing ???
by wishing for walleyes
5 minutes 4 seconds ago
stud pattern?
by PierBridge
6 minutes 6 seconds ago
Camo Arctic Armor Bibs
by wishing for walleyes
9 minutes 10 seconds ago
any plumber's here?
by NAMASafetyDirector
16 minutes 16 seconds ago
Injection Oil
by NAMASafetyDirector
29 minutes 6 seconds ago
Running a 20 amp circuit to a shed
by MuleShack
46 minutes 8 seconds ago
Vikings Defensive Line Suspension?
by zepman
52 minutes 22 seconds ago
Good Beers
by hoggs222
54 minutes 47 seconds ago
most disguesting food you have ever eaten?
by hoggs222
Today at 12:53 AM
Newest Members
TMSmalley, upnorthgsp, tri_fecta333, True Blue, Jayson60
40280 Registered Users
Featured Member
Registered: 11/04/99
Posts: 9023
Top Posters today
FlowageTamer 32
snoozebutton 32
shackbash 27
harvey lee 25
jimalm 23
stfcatfish 23
skeeterpro1 22
Bass N Spear 18
Cooter 17
picksbigwagon 16
Forum Stats
40280 Members
185 Forums
182105 Topics
1551626 Posts

Max Online: 3699 @ 05/13/08 12:57 PM
Page 3 of 3 < 1 2 3
Topic Options
#1498410 - 08/21/08 12:54 PM Re: Statewide 48" minimum [Re: Fishin Dan]
Go2fish Offline
HotSpotOutdoors Family

Registered: 11/03/06
Posts: 36
Originally Posted By: Fishin Dan
Originally Posted By: Go2fish
I do agree though a 40" fish is not really that big, have seen several 40-44" mounts and they are not really that impressive except for a waste of $500 and an almost really big fish.


Just because a 40-44" fish isnt a trophy to you doesnt mean that its not a trophy to anyone else. I know alot of fisherman that have never caught even a 30" musky let alone a 40". Im not trying to start anything here all im saying is that the definition of a trophy just depends on who you are and how often you fish.



I agree with you as well, to each their own. I go fishing with my niece and nephew all the time and there are totaly different keeper slots when they are in the boat then when it is just me and my buddies who fish all the time....To me a 40 inch fish when it could grow to 55" in certain waters is not that big in relation to how big it could get. No question here in MN a 40 inch anything is a giant. Am a bit of a numbers geek by day soo if Muskies get to say 55 inches then a 40 incher is at about 63% of how big it could get. Also more of a Walleye guy so to me that same equation gets me bringing 19inch Walleye to the taxidermist.

These are just my opinions and I am in no way trying to steer anyone to have the same views as me or say that if someones opinions on this are difft from mine they are wrong...Just want to catch really, really big fish!!!!

Top
#1498421 - 08/21/08 01:08 PM Re: Statewide 48" minimum [Re: Go2fish]
Rmac Offline
IceLeaders Family

Registered: 07/23/08
Posts: 27
Loc: Mahtomedi, MN
One thing I have always thought could be promoted a little more is the proper way to release a musky. We and the Dnr spend a lot of dough to put these toothy critters in the lakes and rivers in MN, why not have a page in the regulations book or a video clip on their website or something. Not saying every crappie fishermen needs a pair of knipex and a big kahuna, but it would be nice to know that these fish that get caught by other anglers aren't bouncing off of every thing in the boat and drying out before the hooks come out. People also should know you have to work with a fish a while before they swim away. -Just a side comment to this subject.

Top
#1498696 - 08/21/08 04:48 PM Re: Statewide 48" minimum [Re: Rmac]
mainbutter Online   content
FishingMN Family

Registered: 04/20/08
Posts: 108
Loc: Northfield, MN
I'm in favor of whatever keeps the fishing waters healthy and manageable.

Without that, the fishing will stink, whether or not you're able to keep your catch.

If a statewide 48'' minimum for musky provides a healthier ecosystem for musky lakes, or even if catch and release only provides a healthier ecosystem, heck I'm 100% for it. I'll never keep a musky in my life, because I only keep the fish I intend to eat, and memories of fishing are 100x more important to me than a wall mount.

I just hope that my trust in the researchers and the system that regulates fishing isn't misplaced, cuz who knows, more restrictions on keeping muskies might be bad for some lakes.

Top
#1498754 - 08/21/08 06:09 PM Re: Statewide 48" minimum [Re: mainbutter]
Muskiefool Offline
HotSpotOutdoors Family

Registered: 11/10/06
Posts: 269
Loc: MN
Education on C&R will only carry the fish so far as has been proven time and again all over the Muskie range, regulation to protect the fish either from harvest such was the case on Elk and the Miss or a Minimum is the best way to regulate harvest and manage fish for a Trophy situation.

A state wide 48 with some additional waters protected even further due to either their potential as world class fisheries or their inherent/intrinsic value for the future will be needed as this pressure grows.


How much value does a 55 on Leech or Winnie hold?? what makes that fish valuable?, how do we protect that fish?, why would we need to protect her?, why is she more or less valuable than a Minnetonka 55?, we need to ask ourselves these questions and others and ask is "A" better for me "B" is it better for the fishery "C" will this eventually benefit me only if we execute or reduce "B" or "A"

Would we be anywhere near the place to fish if it was still a 30 Min ??, Washington just went from 36 to 50 for tigers, it will be interesting to see how those fish respond to the reduction in mortality.

Many of us are convinced that Muskies are released 99.9% of the time just because thats a fact for MI members, the reality is many fish are harvested all across the state at probably less of a percntage than ever before but the additional amount of anglers is the concern for the additional protection.

I ask the MN DNR about the main points they observed from the 550+ responses in the public input, the first thing they said was the majority want a quality Muskie fishery and the opportunity to catch Large Pike.

I hope these overwhelming requests put a 48 on the fast track, If you get time just read the Long Range Plan it answer's and addresses so many issues and angles on this subject I guarantee you'll learn something about the fish how they effect the lakes and what is needed to maintain the fishing we enjoy.

http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/fisheries/muskiepike_2020.html



Edited by Muskiefool (08/21/08 06:15 PM)
_________________________
John Underhill
Fish > Ego

Top
Page 3 of 3 < 1 2 3


Moderator:  cjac, Jonny P, polarsusd81, RK 
Hot Spot Outdoors


Ice Leaders Sponsors


Support our Sponsors